Compare And Contrast Batman Of Dc And Iron Man - 925 Words

Comics, (specifically superhero comics,) have been a pop culture icon for over 50 years. Though there are comics from all over the place, the main two companies that are most well known are Marvel comics and DC comics. Of these two companies, two of the most well known superheroes are Batman, of DC, and Iron Man, of Marvel. Though they have much in common, they have many differences that need to be discussed, because people are constantly trying to argue whether or not one hero is better than the other. Batman and Iron Man are two of these said heroes. Let’s start with money. Money is always a factor in life, is it not? I wish it were otherwise, but both Iron Man and Batman are successful in protecting the people of their respective†¦show more content†¦The two heroes both use technology to fight crime and protect the common people, but the tech they use is vastly different. Iron Man uses, to an extent, a suit of armor. Equipped with the power of the ARC reactor, the Iron Man suit has many different weapons and tech built into it. The first and foremost utility it uses is the jets located in the hands, feet, and back to fly. The power of the ARC reactor is nigh limitless, so this gives Tony the ability to fly at the same speed, if not faster than most military aircraft. Another important piece of equipment that was made before the Iron Man suit is J.A.R.V.I.S., Tony’s artificial intelligence. J.A.R.V.I.S. stands for Just A Rather Very Intelligent System, aptly named by Stark himself, and it is a highly sophisticated AI that runs most of Tony’s tech. J.A.R.V.I.S. usually serves as a reminder for Tony not to go completely nuts with his suit, something Tony usually ignores given the situation. Batman, however, uses a very broad assortment of gadgets, along with his martial arts skills and large amounts of money from Wayne Enterprises. Because of his intellect, he makes his own tech to help him as he fights crime in Gotham city. Among these gadgets is the grappling hook, Batman’s most prominent and well known gadgets. He uses it to escape sticky situations as well as climb to the rooftops where he moves. Some other things he uses are the finger-taser, freeze grenades, underwater bootShow MoreRelated_x000C_Introduction to Statistics and Data Analysis355457 Words   |  1422 Pagesinterpreting results in authentic situations or give students the experience necessary to be able to use statistical methods in real settings. We believe that the exercises and examples are a particular strength of this text, and we invite you to compare the examples and exercises with those in other introductory statistics texts. Many students are skeptical of the relevance and importance of statistics. Contrived problem situations and artiï ¬ cial data often reinforce this skepticism. A strategy thatRead MoreContemporary Issues in Mana gement Accounting211377 Words   |  846 Pageswork processes unintelligible. Translated, for example, into piece rates, standard costs, or overhead allocation rules, the underlying logic may be clear to the accounting expert but irrelevant to most employees (van der Veeken and Wouters 2002). By contrast, standard cost information broken down into its constituents for each process step could more easily be used for operational problem solving. (Ahrens and Chapman 2004: 279–80) Internal transparency in performance measurement and control systemsRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pages.............................................................................................. 248 Fallacy of Circular Reasoning........................................................................................................... 250 Straw Man Fallacy.............................................................................................................................. 251 False Dilemma Fallacy........................................................................................

Criminal Jusitce Free Essays

Amanda Burris Introduction to the Courts Assignment 1. 1 Federalism: An outdated concept? Mrs. Mary Morgan January 14 2012 Federalism has been around since the start of our nation. We will write a custom essay sample on Criminal Jusitce or any similar topic only for you Order Now It has tried to balance and set boundaries between the national and state government which has changed significantly since the start of time. It is still evolving as we are in the twenty-first century. The role that our government has today is expanding. The framers helped create this federalist system, and outlined the powers in the Constitution. There are four types of power enumerated which can declare war, coin money, levy taxes, and regulate interstate commerce. The second type-implied power regulates telecommunications, and builds interstate highways. The third inherent power allows for defining itself from foreign and domestic enemies. The last power prohibited suspended the writ of habeas corpus, and tax exports (http://www. sparknotes. com/us-government-and-politics/american-government/federalism/section1. rhtml). At the Constitutional Convection, there was a lot of disagreement. Many feared that the government was too strong, and delegates were afraid that the state’s rights were weak. As a result the Constitution created a federal system where power is divided and shared between the national and state governments (http://www. sparknotes. com/us-government-and-politics/american-government/federalism/section2. rhtml). There are several pros and cons to federalism. Some of the pros include fosters state loyalties, creates laboratories of democracy, leads to political stability, encourages pluralism, and ensures separation of powers and prevents tyranny. The cons include preventing the creation of a national policy, and leading to a lack of accountability (http://www. sparknotes. com/us-government-and-politics/american-government/federalism/section4. rhtml). Concentrating all power in the federal government would pose as a serious threat to privacy and our constitutional rights for several reasons. Look at our current healthcare system now that President Obama has imposed there are five main freedoms’ I believe that we lose. First our freedom to chose what’s included in our health plan, second the freedom to be rewarded for healthy living, third freedom to choose a high-deductible coverage, fourth freedom to keep my existing plan, and last the freedom to chose a doctor. In addition, there will be increased coverage that will raise the cost, new taxes, penalties, and fee’s that will hurt small businesses (http://www. cmsschicago. org/chicago-senior-pulse-blog/2012/11/2/the-facts-of-obamacare. aspx#. UPRBglHheCe). Obama Healthcare is just one example of how allowing the government to have power can hurt the American people. Our current President is trying to get everything turned over to the government so in the end, we have to answer to them, and ultimately the government has total control. We are seeing in our day of age how dangerous, and out of control, the government is when power if given to them (http://www. cmsschicago. org/chicago-senior-pulse-blog/2012/11/2/the-facts-of-obamacare. aspx#. UPRBglHheCe). My position is that the government should have limited power, and that the power they have be shared fairly between the federal and state governments as it once was. Our government was never as controlling as it is today, partially because of the world we live in and because of the leader we have running our country. Today we are being told what healthcare plans are right for us and what our kids are allowed it consume in school. Another big issue is the government controlling guns now. Violence is never going to stop, if they government takes away the right to bear arms people who are truly motivated to commit a crime will be making homemade bombs. Violence is never going to end, and taking away guns is not going to help. This is the reality of the world we live in today, people are violent and motivated How to cite Criminal Jusitce, Essay examples

International Libel and Privacy The Automobile Manufacturers

Question: Discuss about theInternational Libel and Privacyfor the Automobile Manufacturers. Answer: The Plaintiff and the Defendants In this case, the plaintiffs are the automobile manufacturers. This is because they are the ones who are bringing a case in the court. They are protesting against unfair legislation passed by the parliament of Dubai. On the other hand, the defendant is the Emirate of Dubai. This is because the case is brought against them, and they are compelled to respond by defending themselves against the accusations that are brought forth, by the group of automobile manufacturers. Is it a Legal Remedy or an Equitable Remedy The case under consideration is an equitable remedy. An equitable remedy is where a plaintiff is seeking an injunction from the court. The aim of the injunction is to prevent the defendant from implementing an act that may be against the law or negatively affect the plaintiff. In the case above, the group of automobile manufacturers is bringing a case against the Emirate of Dubai, in a bid of preventing the emirate from implementing the law that restricts the emission of carbon dioxide in the emirates (Tarbuck Lester, 2009). On the other hand, a legal remedy is brought in a court when the plaintiff seeks for damages for harm caused through the actions of a defendant. The main aim of the legal remedy is to seek for compensation, as opposed to seeking an injunction. This compensation is always referred to as damages. In the case above, the group of automobile manufacturers are not seeking for any damages, and but their aim is to prevent the government from implementing a law that is not consistent with the Federal Laws of the region. The Primary Source of the Law The Primary source of law that the group of manufacturers were relying on was the Federal Law that governs the United Arab Emirates. (Glasser, 2013) Dubai is one of the Emirates within the UAE; hence, any law that that the emirates passes, and is inconsistent with the Federal Laws, the law is null and void, and can be challenged in the courts. Where to Find Relevant UAE Federal Laws One of the areas that can be used to find a relevant Federal Law of the UAE is by looking at the constitution of the country. The constitution explains the relationships between the different emirates, how they are governed (Dubai, 2010; Zahlan, 2016)). It also identifies some of the most important economic, environmental and social pillars of the emirates. A relevant UAE Federal law can also be found at the Federal Supreme Court. These are rulings issued by the Federal court regarding the issue, or issues that are related to the conflict being pursued. These laws can also be found at the Ministry of Justice (Hudec, 2013). This ministry provides regulations and laws that govern the affairs of federal ministries and departments. Branches in the Court Structure of the UAE There are three major branches within the court structure of the UAE. These branches are the Sharia Courts, The Criminal and The Civil Courts (Kawamura, 2013). These courts are always referred to as the Courts of First Instance. The other two types of court system are, the Court of Appeal and the Court of Cessation. References Dubai, C. (2010). United Arab Emirates. Sandgrouse, 14, 72-80. Glasser, C. J. (2013). The United Arab Emirates (UAE). International Libel and Privacy Handbook: A Global Reference for Journalists, Publishers, Webmasters, and Lawyers, Third Edition, 513-521. Hudec, R. E. (2010). Developing countries in the GATT legal system. Cambridge University Press. Kawamura, A. (2013). The Dubai Approach as a New Resolution System for Islamic Finance Dispute Cases. Tarbuck, A., Lester, C. (2009). Dubais Legal System: Creating a Legal Regulatory Framework for a Modern Society. Zahlan, R. S. (2016). The Making of the Modern Gulf States: Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman (Vol. 10). Routledge.